I use noindex on pages that shouldn't ever be seen (such as a web app) in search engines. If you block a page in robots.txt and then include it in an XML sitemap, youâre being a tease. I wouldn't use nofollow on a page unless 100% of the outbound links are to noindexed pages....otherwise, you're just throwing away link juice. Seriously, all these years i thought just add xml sitemap is enough to get an attention from Google. Great post.
Do you have any advice for small sites? An all-in-one SEO toolset to boost your search engine rankings. Cheers, Martin. You were unclear as to when it was a good idea to use noindex,nofollow so I thought I'd provide an example. Very helpful!, Sometimes we have the best information in front of our eyes and we do not realize that, I've learned a lot about XML sitemaps in a single post, clarifying several ideas, I'll share the link so others can read it,
Sometimes we have the best information in front of our eyes and we do not realize thatWithin days, we saw improved crawl stats for the website. It sounds kind of odd, but when your writing content 11 hours a day 4 days a week it does get tiresome and easy to drift off topic. What did you edit it with or create it with?, Thanks Michael, lots of useful info in here, thanks for the help.
Good point. However, I have noticed that if you want fast indexing, submitting to Google via Google search console is the fastest to get a page indexed. 1) HTML Sitemap: As Michael explained XML Sitemap is like giving clue to Google that these pages are important for Indexing whereas HTML sitemaps are usually give clue to visitors to have a better and easier site experience. (Bucket image, prior to my decorating them, courtesy of Minnesota Historical Society on Flickr.). I want to add 2 important things which needs to be understood along with this great article! Broaden your SEO knowledge with resources for all skill levels. XML is short for âextensible markup language,â which is a way to display information on a site. Google Search Console wonât tell you which pages theyâre indexing, only an overall number indexed in each XML sitemap. You don't need to list each individual Sitemap listed in the index file. It is also true that my sites are so small and therefore the importance of this tool could be less than for huge projects. Head to our, Jibbed It's only a a hint to Search Crawler to select between URLs on the same site.
If you're not getting search traffic to those pages anyway, then I'd noindex them, as you're right....they may be dragging down your rankings for other pages on the site. A sitemap is a file where you provide information about the pages, videos, and other files on your site, and the relationships between them. It's not processed by the web server with every request, like .htaccess is. How do you see robots.txt affecting performance?
When you submit an XML sitemap in Search Console, it's a hint/suggestion to Google that you've either updated that content or it's new. This may be a good idea but googlebot ultimately will do what it things is best, which pages it feels is most relevant. You can then look for sitemaps that have a low indexation rate, and then that's where your problems lie. edited 2017-04-13T13:26:32-07:00, https://www.visualitineraries.com/ItinSiteMap.asp. Pointing Google at a page and asking them to index it doesnât really factor into it.
Great and useful information. If that's the case, then you probably need to work on your login security :-). Letâs say youâve got one great page full of fabulous content that ticks all the boxes, from relevance to Panda to social media engagement.
I understand that in an ideal world, we would create unique descriptions for each product, but this client doesn't have the time or money to devote to such an effort for his hundreds of different products. And after optimizing the sitemap and robots.txt, we saw better crawling stats in GSC.
With the current site, these pages are being indexed, and I'm wondering if we couldn't improve our client's rankings quicker by not indexing them in the new iteration of his site vs. spending the time, effort, and money to create unique product descriptions with quality content (which isn't a viable option currently). Hey Micheal, Just to touch on what you said regarding utility I often ask myself before posting anything on one of our websites for example "Is it relevant?". If a human wont read my content, why would a search engine?Please also forgive I'm still a layman but If I have agents/brokers that access a training or sensitive information section that is not intended for public eyes or indexing, isn't this where no index no follow could apply? Thanks.
Having said that, there might possibly be a conflict between the two plugins, i.e. Why would they want to send a user to a site like that? But I recommend to do to noindex, follow because it indicates search engines that you do not want the pages to be indexed. They've also got some very helpful settings like noindexing subpages of archives, noindexing tag archives, etc. Next for category pages . For example, if you click on post-sitemap.xml youâll see all Yoast.comâs post URLs (click on the image to enlarge): Yoast.comâs post XML sitemap.
You were unclear as to when it was a good idea to use noindex,nofollow so I thought I'd provide an example.
Excellent post Michael, I use Yoast plugin and that helps me solve most of these problems. Thanks for sharing.Last note on the e-commerce indexing fantastic when a person is wondering why there are so many products not being consumed by the index bot.
For your PHP pages that have no HTML on them, I'd block those in robots.txt.